Friday, December 6, 2019

Leadership In Business Case Study Of Microsoft Antitrust - Samples

Question: Discuss about the Leadership In Business - Microsoft Antitrust Case Study. Answer: Investigated the incident; Large computer software manufacturer company Microsoft has been investigated and found guilty while violating public and government trust. The Antitrust case in which the company was found was discovered in the year 1995 and court alleged that the company violated the laws in the year 1997. The manufacturers were ordered to distribute their work systems i.e. manufacturing of software and applications management into two divisions. The trial took place in U.S District court and hence entire organisation faced a severe incident that caused major disruption and loss of productivity(Butts, 2010). Took actions to rectify the situation or to prevent it from occurring; In order to get through the situation, exclusive legal contracts were made with various parties along with making tie up with IE to Windows .50. Under the allegations made by government, the company signed a written decree which forbade the company from using its operating system for dominating other manufacturers in same domain(Economides, 2003). Communicated this to relevant groups or staff within your organisation Communication of such a dreadful event with the relevant group members was not easy. On the other hand, the case spread rapidly in public since government and local public were involved. Legal authorities were communicated at once along with lawyers who were suitable for the case(Brinkley, 2000). Evaluated any legislative or ethical considerations that may have impacted the way that you handled the incident; While handling the antitrust case of Microsoft, it can be considered as a legislative mistake in the company which not only gave a bad impact on employees, but entire nation showing unfaithfulness among technology companies in order to gain monopoly. The analysis made concludes that government and regulators will always thereafter keep these companies in sight from getting disorganised in todays competitive world(Domanska, 2018). References: Brinkley, J. (2000). U.S. VS. MICROSOFT: THE OVERVIEW; U.S. JUDGE SAYS MICROSOFT VIOLATED ANTITRUST LAWS WITH PREDATORY BEHAVIOR. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2000/04/04/business/us-vs-microsoft-overview-us-judge-says-microsoft-violated-antitrust-laws-with.html Butts, C. (2010). The Microsoft Case 10 Years Later: Antitrust and New Leading "New Economy" Firms. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=httpsredir=1article=1105context=njtip Domanska, A. (2018). The Famous History of Microsofts Antitrust Case. Retrieved from https://www.industryleadersmagazine.com/famous-history-microsofts-antitrust-case/ Economides, N. (2003). The Microsoft Antitrust Case. Retrieved from https://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/homeworks/Microsoft_Case.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.